COMMUNITY Cancel Culture Thread: New 60 Minutes Boss Fires Scott Pelley in Scorched-Earth Letter: ‘You Hijacked My First Meeting’

you one of them crackas that's gon save us & show us niggas the light, whether we like it or not cuz we don't kno no better



hell if it wasn't for gracious crackas such as yourself we'd prolly still be in Africa uncivilized living in mud huts or sumn





whether you're trying to or not, that's the energy you're giving off
 
BRIAN B. said:
you one of them crackas that's gon save us & show us niggas the light, whether we like it or not cuz we don't kno no better



hell if it wasn't for gracious crackas such as yourself we'd prolly still be in Africa uncivilized living in mud huts or sumn





whether you're trying to or not, that's the energy you're giving off
Click to expand...
So u won't admit u were wrong? That's fine
 
Let me just say it’s not the point of being contrarian as you can see folks on this board love a conflict. It’s applying logic consistently when critiquing the two political parties. Or matter of fact that’s with anything; Keep your logic consistent and you may find yourself in less circular conversations.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
Can u show me the quote?
Click to expand...

Well there's the quote where you say you think there's more hypocrisy to call out on Dems

We are on a predominantly democrat leaning website. There is more hypocrisy to call out on Dem side than Republican
Click to expand...

And the other quote where you openly admit that your povs can be boiled down to being contrarian

Irl im around a wider variety of politcal beliefs that if it was reflected on here I'd prob just be reduced to a contrarian
Click to expand...
 
ChicagoFigure said:
Contrarian implies I'm disagreeing just for the sake of disagreeing does it not? Bc if so, that's not what I'm doing.

If I trash Republicans I'll get no pushback, the second I equate anything at all to dems it's like clock work. Add to that 95% of the time I get on that both sides shit is after someone injected it into conversation.

Then I hear "why do u keep both side'sing"
Click to expand...
Are you not doing just for the sake of two siding things? It serves no purpose other than to have your voice be heard.

When democrats are back in power and pulling some bullshit, call them out like you did when Biden was pushing Covid mandates.

Which brings me to my next point, when you’re calling out democrats, I haven’t seen you two sides against republicans. Which further lends credence to your one sided two siding.
 
BlackRain said:
Well there's the quote where you say you think there's more hypocrisy to call out on Dems



And the other quote where you openly admit that your povs can be boiled down to being contrarian
Click to expand...
I'm not calling myself a contrarian here in making the point that that's how it can be perceived and why it can be perceived that way. U misinterpreted.
 
Richdollaz said:
Let me just say it’s not the point of being contrarian as you can see folks on this board love a conflict. It’s applying logic consistently when critiquing the two political parties. Or matter of fact that’s with anything; Keep your logic consistent and you may find yourself in less circular conversations.
Click to expand...
Well ironically this is the perspective I've been coming from towards the "other side" which is the main point of both siding things
 
TheNightKing said:
Are you not doing just for the sake of two siding things? It serves no purpose other than to have your voice be heard.

When democrats are back in power and pulling some bullshit, call them out like you did when Biden was pushing Covid mandates.

Which brings me to my next point, when you’re calling out democrats, I haven’t seen you two sides against republicans. Which further lends credence to your one sided two siding.
Click to expand...
We've been over this before. How about this, I won't bring up both sides if u guys don't do it first. And if u do it first, stop complaining when I respond to it
 
ChicagoFigure said:
We've been over this before. How about this, I won't bring up both sides if u guys don't do it first. And if u do it first, stop complaining when I respond to it
Click to expand...

I would also say it would help you to detect sarcasm better..because there's stuff you've reacted to that was clearly in jest yet you take it was serious and as if it's an attack.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
We've been over this before. How about this, I won't bring up both sides if u guys don't do it first. And if u do it first, stop complaining when I respond to it
Click to expand...
The distinction needs to be made or else the harm being caused is understated. By saying things are two sided you suggest that it’s no worse than what’s happened in the past.

A bomb is a bomb but an IED is a lot different from a nuke. When people are talking IED’s and someone keeps saying “well a nuke is a bomb too” it diminishes the impact a nuke has.

So if we say ”two sides” in response to an action taken by this administration and you chime in, expect this type of argument to occur.
 
ChicagoFigure said:
I'm not calling myself a contrarian here in making the point that that's how it can be perceived and why it can be perceived that way. U misinterpreted.
Click to expand...

There is a certain seriousness you seem to take when voicing displeasure with Dems that doesn't seem to exist when talking about Republicans. With them you seem to brush it off. With Dems you talk as if they personally came after you. Maybe apply the same level of seriousness to both. And also being better at acknowledging that there are levels to things that make your both sides stance fall flat on quite a few instances
 
BlackRain said:
There is a certain seriousness you seem to take when voicing displeasure with Dems that doesn't seem to exist when talking about Republicans. With them you seem to brush it off. With Dems you talk as if they personally came after you. Maybe apply the same level of seriousness to both. And also being better at acknowledging that there are levels to things that make your both sides stance fall flat on quite a few instances
Click to expand...
Will u admit u were wrong about me calling myself a contrarian?
 
TheNightKing said:
The distinction needs to be made or else the harm being caused is understated. By saying things are two sided you suggest that it’s no worse than what’s happened in the past.

A bomb is a bomb but an IED is a lot different from a nuke. When people are talking IED’s and someone keeps saying “well a nuke is a bomb too” it diminishes the impact a nuke has.

So if we say ”two sides” in response to an action taken by this administration and you chime in, expect this type of argument to occur.
Click to expand...
Okay, so we will just keep going as we have. Good talk.
 
BlackRain said:
I would also say it would help you to detect sarcasm better..because there's stuff you've reacted to that was clearly in jest yet you take it was serious and as if it's an attack.
Click to expand...
Ironic that after I pointed out u misinterpreting something u respond by telling me how to interpret things
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top